Conspiracy to Infiltrate Drugs, Russians, Chinese and Cubans, from Mexico

* INFILTRATE CUBAN, RUSSIAN AND CHINESE IN U.S., ILLEGALLY, FROM MEXICO

* A CUBAN, "" FIRST LADY "OF THE MEXICAN STATE OF QUINTANA ROO?

* WHY KEEP AS CANDIDATE TO A LINKED WITH NARCO CASTRO?

The recent arrest of drug-candidate of the ruling party PAN and the PRD socialist State government tourist Quintana Roo, Gregorio Sánchez Martínez, has become a political bombshell in Mexico and the United States:

1 .- It has uncovered links between intelligence officials of the Castro dictatorship in Cuba, with drug gangs operating in Mexico.

2 .- He has revealed to the intelligence analysts in both countries and behind the international campaign against the so-called Law Arizona narco gangs are responsible for communist infiltration from Mexico on U.S. soil by illegal Cuban, Chinese and Russian .

3 .- It has validated the hypothesis of intelligence centers, in the sense that one of the objectives of the Cuban intelligence is "sowing" in Mexican territory Castro agents who, whether through marriage to citizens of this country or through the nationalization process, looking to enter the political organs of Mexico to crew in their interests.

4 .- It has demonstrated the desire of the Castro to manipulate the domestic politics of Mexico,  claim that a Cuban wife of Gregorio Sánchez Martínez drug candidate, ie, Niurka Saliva Alba Benitez become "candidate" to "governor" of the Mexican state of Quintana Roo, while her husband kept under judicial process. What started out to be the "first lady" of the state.

Do not forget significant elements:

* Niurka, the wife of the candidate drug PAN-PRD alliance government of Quintana Roo, is the daughter of Jose Angel Pino Saliva, Interior Ministry colonel in Cuba, who works for the intelligence services (intelligence) of the Castro regime.

* Saliva Cuban Colonel Pino, in effect, " has always been close to Fidel Castro . "

* There are testimonies that the same Niurka is directly involved with the infiltration of illegal Cubans, Russians and Chinese to the United States via Mexico:

"Greg's wife, Niurka Saliva Alba Benítez, taking advantage of Cuban origin, was responsible to contact their countrymen and their families in the United States, who asked him to pay them out of the island.

"Along with working Niurka Valley Boris Alonso, who was a member of Los Zetas. Puma also participated, a member of the police force in the city of Cancún, who was in charge of the Plaza de Los Zetas. Boris had income accounting of illegal Russians, Chinese and Cubans, as by nationality he had to deliver a timely payment to Puma. "

* In addition, it has also found that t he security adviser narco-PRD PAN candidate Greg, the son of a former interior minister in Cuba.

* You must be mentioned that " in 2004, Greg was charged in Chiapas, homicide and robberyviolence. Greg's siblings: David, and Daniel Feliciano, defendants serving time for activities related to organized crime. Always, as Castrillon and his story, Magdalena Sanchez, Greg's sister, was arrested at the airport in Mexico City with her husband and $ 300,000 whose origin could not verify. "

From the foregoing, the intelligence analysts agree:

a) Greg was shielded by Castro's Cuban intelligence.

b) The links below which seemed to be subject to that, they were betrothed, emotional and economic.

c) The coverage has been offered the ruling party PAN, is a product of innocence, naivete presidentre settled formal, visible, of the party, César Nava and those who advise and promote.

d) It is clear that legal action against the drug candidate had decided not to exercise, as evidenced by the time he had been asleep denunciation against him, against his wife and against others involved, by the protected witness. And they own statement corroborates the Secretary of the Interior (Interior) of Mexico, Fernando Gómez Mont, in the sense that the leftist PRD, had been informed of the investigation long ago.

e) Otherwise, skip a serious, embarrassing question: so much since Greg was framed by the protected witness, and immediately after the results of financial investigations, prosecutors and family members confirmed their involvement with organized crime, was not logical to assume that both the Ministry of the Interior (Fernando Gomez Mont) and the Ministry of Public Security (Genaro Garcia Luna) and the Ministry of Finance (Ernesto Cordero Arroyo), to inform both President Felipe Calderon Cesar Nava of the risk, inconvenience, to make the party a candidate narcopolitics PAN official?

f) Do not be assumed that all the secretaries of state engaged in such research the information you hid Felipe Calderón? "I deliberately hid the data to the nominal president, visible, PAN, Cesar Nava? The latter can not believe it, because the interior minister himself, Gomez Mont said that some time ago and had informed the PRD of investigations.

Well, ladies and gentlemen, then we got to the final question: why, if at Los Pinos, the PAN and the PRD was known about the investigations, PAN and PRD insisted on keeping the candidacy of narco?

But worse still:

What did turn back the government secrecy surrounding the background and narcocandidato clandestine operations of the PAN-PRD and its association with the cartels linked to the intelligence community-Castro Cuba? What forced them to stop the narcocandidato, even at the expense of the prestige of the ruling party?

The answer, according to intelligence analysts in Washington.

Yes, in Washington.

It's what they say.

Obama and Calderon, Defeated; if Arizona Strikes Law, Obama loses Congress

* CALDERON CRITICAL OF EU LAW IN USA, "Obama criticized MEXICAN LAWS IN MEXICO?

* CANDIDATES FOR OBAMA LOST THE PRIMARY HELD ON TUESDAY

* PAN candidate LOST THE ELECTIONS IN THE STATE OF YUCATAN

The meeting of the Presidents of Mexico and the United States in Washington, has two peculiarity:

1 .- Both Barck Obama Felipe Calderón received the vote of punishment in the recent elections in their respective countries on Sunday in the Mexican state of Yucatan, and on Tuesday night in the primaries in several states of the United States.

2 .- From this Wednesday, was buried the Presidential practice of not publicly criticizing country outside the sovereign decisions of the latter. Indeed, the Mexican president spoke out against the Arizona Act was in U.S. territory. U.S. officials now able to do so on our laws, on Mexican soil.

Whether or not you can be in accordance with Arizona law, must be made clear several things:

A) This Law was not imposed but discussed and approved by the local Congress.

B) In line with this, the governor supplemented the legislative process, to sign it.

C) The polls indicate a majority of the population in that state, approves the Law

D) Other opinion polls show that the law is widely popular in the United States and other entities are willing to adopt similar regulations.

E) The Attorney General of the United States publicly admitted that not even read that law

WHAT WILL OBAMA

CALDERON TO?

If the polls show that most of the people of Arizona support that law ..

If the polls show that Americans nationwide support such regulation largely ...

And moreover if the candidates promoted by President Obama receiving the punishment vote in Tuesday's primary elections in different states of the Union ...

It looks like Obama, if undertaken against Arizona law, runs the serious risk of losing the majority in Congress during the elections that will be performed in the U.S. this year.

In fact, surveys indicate that most of the public is dissatisfied with Washington and the Democratic Party will lose the legislative majority in elections this year due to dissatisfaction with the management of Obama.

Tuesday was primary election, to choose party candidates. The strong opposition to Obama, won overwhelmingly in the ranks of the Republican Party. And the most linked to Obama, lost in the Democratic Party.

So, Obama and Calderon should "weave" very fine, as both were voted out by the voters in their respective countries. On Sunday, in the Mexican state of Yucatan, the big loser was the PAN, the party Calderón.

perezstuart@gmail.com

Betting on Change EU ruling party in Mexico

* EU CONSIDERS THE PAN COULD LOSE THE PRESIDENCY IN 2012

* UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR send a direct message

To political analysts, for followers of the Mexican political scene, as well as intelligence experts, was highly significant point made by the U.S. ambassador in Mexico, Carlos Pascual, just the Sunday before in Washington.

Indeed, his words have been described as a three-cushion carom true, that did not go unnoticed within the inner circles of power:

1 .- They show that in the White House there is doubt that the PAN can win the presidential elections of 2012.

2 .- That there welcome in Washington by the replacement of the military in law enforcement tasks in the fight against drug trafficking, as the foreign entrepreneurs representrante installed in Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, had complained last December that were subject to extortion. Moreover, there were fruits of the policy implemented by the Mexican government fight narco-only shot:

'A few hours before lead the way "solution to Juarez," the representative of 332 maquila plants in the city said that "more than a year of shooting did not end with insecurity, by contrast, the weighted. We have abandoned social fabric. " (El Universal, 9 December 2009)

3. - To be is expecting a more timely legal action against members of drug cartels, it is done with respect for human rights and that the government strategy is debated, put to discussion.

Regarding the latter we must remember that from the highest circles of power have launched criticisms of the strategy pursued by the Mexican authorities. Forbes magazine, for example, has qualified to Joaquin Guzman Loera, El Chapo, as one of the most powerful but also as one of the richest in the world. Chapo, as is public domain, escaped in the Fox administration of jail and to date has not been arrested. And recently, the influential European magazine The Economist echoed those who point out that in the fight against Mexican gangs, is favored to El Chapo Guzman.

WHAT IF I LOSE THE NEXT ELECTION THE PAN?

Remember that some have noted that if the Mexican ruling party PAN loses the presidential election of 2012, Mexico may fall into the hands of drug gangs. The representative of the White House, however, denied this assumption. He said:

"He expressed confidence that there is political consensus in Mexico that should not relent in the fight against drug trafficking. I have spoken with representatives of the three main political parties (PAN, PRI and PRD). All reaffirm that the fight against drug trafficking must follow.

The risk, as some have said, d and that maybe with the election of 2012 is somehow going to loose this fight against drugs, I do not see. I do not share the fear that the drug war wanes after the 2012 elections, he said. "(La Jornada, 25 January 2010, p. 14)

What does the above?

Just two things:

A) It disrupts the PAN campaign aimed at instilling fear among the people, that if he loses the election, Mexico will become a narco-state.

B) With the above clearly shows up in the White House, there is no favorite for the 2012 presidential election. So much so that even have spoken with leaders of major parties to ensure commitment in the battle against drug cartels ... "after the 2012 elections" (sic). If Washington were sure of an election victory PAN in the presidential elections within two years, would the event that their representatives speak with leaders of opposition parties - the PRI and PRD - to know what to do "after the 2012 elections? Are not no?

In other words, therefore, Obama would not bet on the PAN.

For the current PAN.

For the PAN's presidential revived and confirmed yesterday, in which its members have to settle for lifting the finger at any presidential initiative. As did the old PRI ... and cost him the presidency.

Chile: Election results have repercussions in Mexico: Strike Plans Official Party Socialist Alliance with

Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash

 

The results of the elections in Chile, on Sunday 17 January 2010, have a broad impact on the political agenda of Mexican President Felipe Calderón and his party, the PAN:

They anticipate their defeat in the elections in which the Mexican ruling party, formally affiliated to the Christian Democratic International, seeks to ally with the Socialists of the PRD.

You just have to remember two things:

1 .- That the Chilean Christian Democrats were associated with the local socialists, leading to Eduardo Frei, son of the Kerensky Chilean presidential candidate. Their alliance was called the Coalition.

2 .- That in Mexico, Calderon's PAN - formal member of the Christian Democratic movement - has aggressively seeking an alliance with the Socialists local PRD and announced that this year the elections will be held in three states Republic, in what appears to be the test of what is intended for the 2012 presidential elections.

Chile, for one, has a new President: Sebastian Pinera.

* In Germany, won Angela Merkel, Christian Democratic Party, which allied with the Socialists. 

* In the U.S., Republican Party candidates have won all the elections that have taken place after the Social Democrat Obama came to power.